2019 Resident Hospital Health Check survey findings

The AMA Queensland Council of Doctors in Training (AMAQ CDT) runs the Resident Hospital Health Check (RHHC) survey annually.

In 2019, the RHHC survey achieved a 43% participation increase - the highest participation yet. total of 882 junior doctors across 19 Hospital and Health Services responded to the survey, representing approximately 38% of Queensland’s 2,313 eligible Resident Medical Officers (RMOs).

Questions covered hospital culture, access to leave, overtime and training and the top six priorities for junior doctors in Queensland were identified.

The responses were used to provide hospitals with grades in the following five domains:

  1. Access to leave
  2. Education and training
  3. Rostering and overtime
  4. Wellbeing and hospital culture
  5. Bullying and harassment

FIND OUT HOW YOUR HOSPITAL RANKED

AMA Queensland has invited directors of clinical training, medical education units or other interested parties who wish to learn more about the results pertaining to their location to contact us and discuss ways to improving their conditions for prospective doctors in training.

If you would like to discuss any aspect of the AMA Queensland Resident Hospital Health Check survey in greater details, please email us at membership@amaq.com.au.

Grab your copy of the
2018 or 2017  Resident Hospital Health Check survey findings


DISCLAIMER
The AMA Queensland Resident Hospital Health Check survey was completed on a voluntary basis by Queensland doctors in training (including those at Intern, Junior House Officer and Senior House Officer) The purpose of this document is to assist graduating medical students as well as current interns and residents with their decision making process when deciding on which hospitals to apply for in the upcoming intern and RMO campaigns. This information is provided in good faith and should only be used as a guide, it is intended to be general in nature and is made available on the understanding that the AMA Queensland and the AMA Queensland Council of Doctors in Training do not make any comment or assertion that the information provided by participants is correct, or reflects the experiences of doctors who did not participate in the survey. Before relying on the information contained in the survey results provided, users should carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness and relevance for their purposes, personal objectives and career goals, and should make their own enquiries, including consulting with the relevant Hospital and staff at the relevant Hospital. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the collation of the information in this survey, AMA Queensland, its employees and the AMA Queensland Council of Doctors in Training cannot be held responsible for the information provided by participants in the survey and cannot be responsible for any loss or damage arising from any person or organisation as a result of the publication of this survey of information. AMA Queensland and the AMA Queensland Council of Doctors in Training do not take any responsibility for the outcomes published in the survey. Comparison of results among hospitals/HSS must be made with caution, as the survey did not involve a probabilistic sampling frame, but instead was open to the entire QLD RMO population, achieving a response rate of 27%. Further, as RMOs were not randomly allocated to hospitals differences in attitudes and expectations of respondents cannot be adequately controlled. This introduces biases into the results which cannot be accounted for. Thus, all differences among hospital/HHS should be interpreted as specific only to the survey respondents and must not be interpreted as representative of the experiences of all junior doctors in QLD. Lastly, the overall raw percentage of responses for each question in 2018 were compared with the same question in 2017, with improvement, no change or worsening indicated by green, yellow and red traffic lights respectively. All analyses and reporting of results, including the derivation of the grade, were undertaken by an Epidemiologist (PhD) with considerable experience in research design and statistical analysis and a strong track-record in health/medical research.